Blue Jackets' Werenski vs. Laine: A Tale of Two Stars
The Columbus Blue Jackets have, at various points in their relatively short NHL history, boasted some truly exciting offensive talent. However, the debate surrounding two particular players β Zach Werenski and Patrik Laine β often dominates conversations among fans and analysts alike. Both are (or were) cornerstone players, each possessing unique skill sets and leaving their own indelible mark on the franchise. This article delves deep into a comparative analysis of Werenski and Laine, exploring their strengths, weaknesses, playing styles, and overall impact on the Blue Jackets.
Zach Werenski: The Two-Way Force
Zach Werenski, a first-round pick in 2015, quickly established himself as a cornerstone of the Blue Jackets' defense. His game transcends simple puck-moving; Werenski is a complete two-way defender.
Strengths:
- Offensive Prowess: While primarily a defenseman, Werenski possesses exceptional offensive instincts. His powerful shot from the point is a constant threat, contributing significantly to the power play. He's also adept at carrying the puck out of the defensive zone and joining the rush, creating scoring opportunities.
- Defensive Stability: Despite his offensive flair, Werenski isn't a liability defensively. He's physically strong, capable of winning board battles and disrupting opposing attacks. His skating ability allows him to effectively cover ground and support his teammates.
- Leadership Qualities: Werenski has worn an "A" on his jersey, showcasing the respect he commands within the locker room. He's a vocal leader on the ice, guiding younger players and setting a positive example through his work ethic.
- Puck-Moving Abilities: Werenski's ability to transition the puck from defense to offense is a key asset. His crisp passes and controlled skating help the Blue Jackets quickly move the puck up the ice and initiate attacks.
Weaknesses:
- Consistency: While incredibly talented, Werenski's performance has seen some fluctuations throughout his career. Maintaining peak performance throughout a long season has been a challenge at times.
- Defensive lapses: Like any young defenseman, Werenski has experienced occasional defensive lapses, particularly when caught out of position. This area has improved over time, but remains an area for potential improvement.
- Injury Prone: Unfortunately, Werenski has battled injuries throughout his career, hindering his ability to play consistently. This has significantly impacted his overall performance and team contribution.
Patrik Laine: The Sniper
Patrik Laine, acquired via trade, brought a different dimension to the Blue Jackets' offense β pure goal-scoring power. His shot is arguably one of the most feared in the NHL.
Strengths:
- Unrivaled Shooting Ability: Laine's release is lightning-quick and incredibly accurate. He can score from anywhere within shooting range, making him a constant threat on the power play and even strength. His ability to find the back of the net is simply remarkable.
- Offensive Instinct: Laine possesses an exceptional hockey sense, especially in front of the net. He has a knack for finding open spaces and getting himself into prime scoring positions.
- Size and Strength: Laine's physical stature makes him difficult to defend. He's strong on the puck and can effectively shield it from opponents.
Weaknesses:
- Defensive Play: Laine's defensive contributions are significantly less impactful compared to Werenski's. Heβs often criticized for his lack of engagement in defensive responsibilities.
- Consistency and Effort: Like Werenski, Laine's consistency has been a point of discussion. While he can score in bunches, there are periods where his offensive production dips. Concerns have also been raised regarding his overall effort level on the ice at times.
- Playmaking Abilities: While a prolific scorer, Laine's playmaking abilities are less developed compared to his shot. He can pass, but his focus is primarily on scoring.
Werenski vs. Laine: A Head-to-Head Comparison
Directly comparing Werenski and Laine is challenging due to their differing roles. Werenski is a two-way defenseman, while Laine is a primarily offensive forward. However, we can look at their overall impact on the team:
- Offensive Contributions: Laine's pure goal-scoring ability gives him an edge in this area. However, Werenski's offensive contributions from the point and his ability to drive play are significant.
- Defensive Contributions: Werenski clearly outperforms Laine in this area. His defensive responsibilities are crucial to the team's success, while Laine's defensive game is a notable weakness.
- Team Impact: Both players have had periods of significant impact on the Blue Jackets. However, Werenski's consistent presence and overall two-way game arguably make him a more valuable asset to the team in the long run, despite Laine's scoring prowess.
- Leadership: Werenski's leadership qualities give him an edge in this aspect. He embodies the qualities of a franchise player, both on and off the ice.
Conclusion
The Werenski vs. Laine debate is ultimately subjective. Both players have contributed significantly to the Blue Jackets, albeit in different ways. Werenski provides a solid foundation of two-way play and leadership, while Laine offers explosive goal-scoring potential. While Laineβs departure from Columbus signifies a shift in the team's direction, Werenskiβs continued presence highlights his enduring value to the franchise. The comparison underscores the diverse skill sets needed for NHL success and the challenge of assessing the true value of a player based solely on statistics. The enduring legacy of both players in Columbus will continue to fuel fan discussions for years to come.