Chelsea 1-2 Fulham: Player Ratings

𝕵𝖊𝖙𝖎𝖒𝖔𝖇 𝕯𝖎𝖌𝖎𝖙𝖆𝖑 𝕸𝖊𝖉𝖎𝖆

You need 5 min read

·

Post on Dec 27, 2024

34 visitor like this post

Share

Chelsea 1-2 Fulham: Player Ratings - A Disappointing Day at Stamford Bridge

Chelsea's recent 1-2 defeat against Fulham at Stamford Bridge was a sobering experience, highlighting the team's ongoing struggles. While the scoreline suggests a closely fought contest, the performance lacked the conviction and cohesion expected from a club of Chelsea's stature. This detailed player rating breakdown analyzes individual contributions, examining both successes and failures within the context of a disappointing match.

Goalkeeper:

• Kepa Arrizabalaga (6/10): Kepa had little chance with either Fulham goal, both well-struck efforts that tested his reflexes. He commanded his area adequately, but couldn't prevent the inevitable. A solid, if unspectacular, performance. He made a few key saves that prevented a more embarrassing scoreline, but ultimately couldn't single-handedly change the outcome.

Defenders:

• Reece James (7/10): Chelsea's brightest spark. James offered a constant threat going forward, delivering dangerous crosses and showing his usual tenacity in defense. While he couldn't prevent Fulham from finding the back of the net, his offensive contributions were a major positive for the Blues. He was a constant outlet on the right flank and a bright spot in a largely disappointing performance.

• Thiago Silva (6.5/10): The veteran defender showed his experience, making several crucial tackles and interceptions. However, he looked slightly slower than usual, and Fulham's forwards managed to exploit some space behind him at times. A steady performance but not his best display. His leadership was still evident, though his age might be showing in these crucial matches.

• Wesley Fofana (6/10): Fofana displayed some promising moments, showcasing his strength and aerial prowess. However, he struggled with Fulham's movement at times and was caught out of position on a few occasions. He needs to build consistency to justify his price tag. Showed glimpses of his potential, but needs more game time to solidify his position.

• Ben Chilwell (5.5/10): Chilwell's performance was largely ineffective. He struggled defensively, failing to track his runners effectively. His attacking contributions were minimal, and he was substituted relatively early. A disappointing display that highlights his inconsistency this season. He needs to rediscover his early season form to earn a regular starting spot.

Midfielders:

• Enzo Fernandez (7/10): Fernandez remains one of Chelsea's most promising players, showcasing his technical ability and vision throughout the game. He dictated the tempo in spells and created a few chances, demonstrating his composure under pressure. However, he needs to be more decisive in the final third. His passing accuracy was excellent, but he could improve his shot selection.

• Conor Gallagher (6/10): Gallagher worked tirelessly in midfield, but lacked the composure and precision needed in the final third. His energy was commendable, but his final ball often lacked accuracy. A hardworking display but not one that particularly influenced the match. He needs to improve his decision-making to truly impact games.

• Mason Mount (5.5/10): A largely ineffective performance from Mount. He struggled to influence the game, and his passing was often inaccurate. He needs to find his form if he wants to stay relevant in this Chelsea squad. His creative spark was missing, and he lacked the dynamism needed in these high-pressure encounters.

Forwards:

• Kai Havertz (5/10): Havertz had a quiet game, failing to make a significant impact. He lacked decisiveness in the final third and was ultimately ineffective as a focal point for the attack. He missed key opportunities and his overall performance lacked impact. A largely disappointing display that needs to improve.

• Raheem Sterling (6/10): Sterling showed glimpses of his pace and trickery, but he lacked the clinical edge needed to convert his chances. He posed a threat in moments but couldn't deliver the decisive strike. He displayed his usual willingness to work hard, but his decision-making needs to be improved. He showed moments of brilliance but lacked the overall consistency needed.

• Mykhailo Mudryk (6.5/10): The most exciting Chelsea player on the pitch. Mudryk showed his incredible pace and skill. While his end product wasn't always there, his directness and dribbling ability were a constant threat to Fulham's defense. He needs more match practice and will likely become a key asset for the club in the coming season. His raw talent shone through, though a lack of experience shows in his final passes.

Substitutes:

• Noni Madueke (6/10): Brought some much-needed energy and directness off the bench, creating a few chances, but couldn't change the outcome of the match. He showed great promise and will be a significant player for Chelsea in the future.

• Christian Pulisic (6/10): Similar to Madueke, he tried to make things happen, but he couldn't affect the outcome of the game. He brought some attacking flair, but didn’t change the flow of the game.

Overall:

The defeat to Fulham exposed several weaknesses within the Chelsea squad. While there were individual moments of brilliance, particularly from Reece James and Enzo Fernandez, a lack of cohesion and clinical finishing ultimately proved costly. The team needs to address its defensive vulnerabilities and improve its attacking potency to compete effectively at the highest level. The future of the squad is still uncertain, but there are signs of hope, especially with the talent of Mudryk and the consistent performance of James. The match highlighted the need for improved team cohesion and a more decisive approach in the attacking third. This defeat should serve as a wake-up call, prompting necessary changes to ensure better performances in future games.