Falcons To Cut Kirk Cousins Before Bonus

𝕵𝖊𝖙𝖎𝖒𝖔𝖇 𝕯𝖎𝖌𝖎𝖙𝖆𝖑 𝕸𝖊𝖉𝖎𝖆

You need 4 min read

·

Post on Dec 22, 2024

40 visitor like this post

Share

Falcons to Cut Kirk Cousins Before Bonus? Unlikely, But Let's Explore the Possibilities

The rumor mill is churning. Whispers are circulating about the Atlanta Falcons potentially cutting Kirk Cousins before a significant bonus payment kicks in. While the likelihood of this happening seems low, it's a juicy enough scenario to warrant a deeper dive. Let's examine the potential factors, the financial implications, and the overall plausibility of the Falcons releasing their starting quarterback.

Why the Speculation? Analyzing the Potential Triggers

The core of this speculation centers around the financial aspect. Cousins' contract likely contains substantial roster bonuses, performance incentives, or guaranteed money triggered at certain dates. If the Falcons felt his performance didn't justify the financial commitment, especially considering their current rebuilding phase, cutting him before these bonuses become payable might seem financially advantageous – at least on the surface.

Several factors could contribute to this hypothetical scenario:

• Poor Performance: If Cousins significantly underperforms expectations, leading to a disastrous season for the Falcons, the team's ownership might lose patience. A string of losses, low quarterback ratings, and an inability to lead the team to success could fuel the argument for a change. However, simply a "bad" season isn't enough; it would need to be demonstrably worse than anticipated.

• Salary Cap Constraints: The NFL operates under a strict salary cap. While the Falcons might have the space currently, future cap implications need consideration. If Cousins' contract proves to be a long-term burden on the cap, hindering the team's ability to build around a younger core, releasing him might be a necessary evil to open up opportunities for more flexible roster management.

• Shift in Team Direction: The Falcons are in a transition period. If the team shifts its focus to a full-blown rebuild, prioritizing younger talent and a long-term vision, Cousins' hefty contract could clash with this strategy. A younger, cheaper quarterback might better fit the timeline of a complete roster overhaul.

• Emergence of a Younger Quarterback: If the Falcons have a promising young quarterback on the roster (either through the draft or a shrewd trade), the decision to cut Cousins might be made easier. The presence of a potential successor could offer a smoother transition and justify the cost of severing ties with Cousins.

The Financial Realities: A Deep Dive into the Numbers

Cutting Cousins before his bonus triggers wouldn't be a simple decision. It involves a complex interplay of financial considerations:

• Dead Cap Hit: Releasing a player typically results in a dead cap hit – a portion of their contract that remains on the team's salary cap even though the player is no longer on the roster. The size of this dead cap hit depends heavily on the structure of Cousins' contract and when the cut occurs. A significant dead cap hit could negate any short-term savings.

• Bonus Structure: The exact structure of Cousins' bonuses is crucial. Understanding when these bonuses become guaranteed, and the amount involved, is paramount. The Falcons' decision hinges on comparing the cost of the dead cap hit against the savings from avoiding bonus payments.

• Potential Savings vs. Long-Term Costs: The Falcons would need to meticulously analyze the potential short-term savings against the long-term implications of losing a starting quarterback. The cost of acquiring a replacement, even a temporary one, could quickly eat into any perceived financial advantage.

The Plausibility Factor: How Likely is This Scenario?

While the possibility exists, the likelihood of the Falcons cutting Kirk Cousins before his bonus is quite low. Here's why:

• The Cost of Replacement: Finding a suitable replacement, especially one who can immediately step in and perform at a comparable level, is incredibly difficult. The quarterback position is arguably the most valuable in football, and readily available high-quality replacements are scarce.

• The Dead Cap Hit: The dead cap hit associated with releasing Cousins would likely be substantial, potentially crippling the team's salary cap flexibility for years to come.

• Public Relations Nightmare: Cutting a high-profile player like Cousins would not be met favorably by fans or media. The Falcons would likely face considerable criticism and damage to their reputation.

• Lack of Clear Successor: Unless the Falcons have a truly exceptional young quarterback already in the pipeline, releasing Cousins creates a gaping hole at a vital position.

Conclusion: More Hype Than Reality?

While the financial incentives might seem to suggest a possible move, the practical realities, including the financial burden of a dead cap hit, the difficulty of replacing a proven starter, and the potential PR fallout, make this scenario highly improbable. The speculation serves as a reminder of the intricate financial maneuvering in the NFL and the constant balancing act between short-term gains and long-term sustainability. For now, it's more likely that the Falcons will continue to evaluate Cousins' performance and explore other avenues for improving the team rather than resorting to such a drastic measure. However, the possibility, however slim, serves as a fascinating case study in the complexities of professional sports management.