"It Ends With Us" Accusation: Lively Vs. Baldoni

𝕵𝖊𝖙𝖎𝖒𝖔𝖇 𝕯𝖎𝖌𝖎𝖙𝖆𝖑 𝕸𝖊𝖉𝖎𝖆

You need 4 min read

·

Post on Dec 23, 2024

48 visitor like this post

Share

"It Ends With Us" Accusation: Colleen Hoover vs. Sarah J. Maas – A Comparative Analysis

Colleen Hoover's It Ends With Us, a novel exploring complex themes of domestic abuse and love, has captivated millions. However, its success has also sparked controversy, particularly accusations of plagiarism leveled against Hoover by some readers comparing it to Sarah J. Maas's A Court of Thorns and Roses series. This article delves into these accusations, comparing the two works to determine the validity of the claims. We will analyze plot points, character archetypes, and thematic elements to understand whether the similarities constitute plagiarism or simply reflect common tropes within the romance genre.

Plot Parallels and Divergences: A Critical Examination

The central accusation revolves around perceived similarities between the relationships depicted in both works. Both It Ends With Us and the A Court of Thorns and Roses series feature strong female protagonists who encounter powerful, flawed male characters. However, while the similarities exist on a surface level, a deeper dive reveals significant differences in plot progression and character development.

It Ends With Us centers on Lily Bloom's relationship with Ryle Kincaid, a neurosurgeon with a volatile temper and a history of abuse. The narrative unfolds as a depiction of a toxic relationship, exploring the cycle of abuse, manipulation, and the protagonist's struggle to escape. The focus is intensely personal, exploring Lily's internal conflict, her journey of self-discovery, and the long road to healing.

In contrast, the A Court of Thorns and Roses series, although encompassing romantic relationships, emphasizes fantastical elements, a complex world-building system, and a broader narrative arc. While Rhysand, a significant male character, displays possessive tendencies and a complicated past, his relationship with Feyre differs significantly from Lily and Ryle's. Rhysand's actions, though questionable at times, are primarily driven by his past traumas and his role in a larger political struggle within the fantasy world. The narrative focuses on the overarching plot, involving political intrigue, magical battles, and Feyre's personal growth within this fantastical context.

While both narratives present strong female characters overcoming adversity, the nature of the adversity and the methods of overcoming it differ substantially. Lily's journey focuses on escaping a real-world abusive relationship, while Feyre's journey involves navigating a dangerous fantasy world, confronting mythical creatures, and growing into her power.

Character Archetypes: Shared Tropes or Direct Imitation?

Arguments suggesting plagiarism often point to similarities in character archetypes. Both series feature a strong, independent female protagonist and a dark, brooding male lead with a troubled past. However, the nuances of these characters diverge considerably. Lily is a relatable, vulnerable protagonist whose journey centers on overcoming emotional trauma and building resilience. Feyre, while equally strong, is propelled by a different set of motivations, centered on survival and self-discovery within a supernatural realm.

The male leads are equally distinct. Ryle's character is defined by his abusive tendencies and his inability to control his anger. Rhysand, while flawed and possessing a complex personality, operates within a very different moral framework, his actions stemming from a unique background and larger narrative context. Attributing the existence of similar character tropes—the strong female lead and the brooding male love interest—to plagiarism ignores the prevalence of these tropes within the romance genre itself.

Thematic Elements: Exploring Overlapping Ground

Both It Ends With Us and the A Court of Thorns and Roses series touch upon similar themes such as love, loss, overcoming adversity, and finding strength within oneself. However, the exploration of these themes differs significantly. It Ends With Us provides a deeply personal and often raw portrayal of domestic abuse and its impact on individuals. It prioritizes the realistic depiction of trauma, recovery, and the complexities of human relationships.

The A Court of Thorns and Roses series, while exploring the dynamics of love and relationships, primarily uses these themes as part of a larger, more fantastical narrative. The focus is on power, self-discovery within a fantastical context, and a much broader scope of conflict than the interpersonal challenges depicted in It Ends With Us.

Conclusion: Separating Accusations from Artistic License

The accusations of plagiarism against Colleen Hoover regarding It Ends With Us lack substantial evidence. While similarities exist in some surface-level aspects of plot and character archetypes, the fundamental differences in narrative structure, character development, thematic focus, and overall plot direction render these similarities insufficient to support claims of plagiarism. The commonalities observed likely reflect common tropes within the romance genre rather than deliberate imitation. Both authors have crafted distinct narratives with unique protagonists and storylines, exploring complex themes within their chosen genres.

The similarities often cited represent common archetypes and thematic elements that are prevalent in many works of fiction. While both narratives explore themes of love, loss, and overcoming adversity, their approaches and the contexts within which these themes are explored are substantially different. Attributing these coincidences to plagiarism ignores the creative freedom and the inherent limitations within any genre. A closer look reveals the distinct narratives crafted by both authors, emphasizing the need for nuanced analysis rather than relying on superficial comparisons to determine artistic merit and originality. The debate highlights the importance of distinguishing between the use of common tropes within a genre and the deliberate copying of another author's unique creative expression.